Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two qualitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part 1” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses.
Use the practice problem and two qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.
In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two qualitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Sample Answer
Research Critique Guidelines – Part I
Qualitative Studies
Background of Study
Lynch et al. (2020) explore the problem of patient’s perspectives when it comes to the use of music therapy in pain management in healthcare settings. In their study, Lynch et al. (2020), therefore, focus on cancer patients who are exposed to music therapy as part of an intervention to manage their pain. The purpose and objective of the Lynch et al. (2020) study is to understand the perception of active and passive music therapy in pain management among patients with cancer. To fulfill the purpose and objective of their study, Lynch et al. (2020), therefore, ask the research question, ‘what is the perception of active and passive music therapy in pain management among patients with cancer?’ Lynch et al. (2020) study have a great significance to nursing practice in that it explores different non-pharmacological interventions that can be used to manage pain among cancer patients. In contemporary times, health care practitioners have been exploring alternative therapies to manage pain among patients as a result of the different adverse effects associated with some pharmacological treatments such as addiction.
On the other hand, Ullsten et al., (2016) qualitative study explore the efficacy of the use of music therapy in the management of pain among infants undergoing painful procedures. In their study, Ullsten et al. (2016), therefore, performed a micro analysis of different infants who were exposed to lullaby singing during painful procedures and how such infants manage pain. The purpose and objective of the Ullsten et al. (2016) study is, therefore, to determine the effectiveness of live music therapy as affective support among patients during painful procedures. To fulfill the purpose and objectives of the study, Ullsten et al. (2016), therefore, posed the research question, ‘what is the effectiveness of live music therapy as effective support among patients during painful procedures? ‘Ulster et al., (2016) study is significant to nursing because there is a demand for non-pharmacological pain management interventions in different nursing practice settings, including the neonatal unit. The results of the Ullsten et al. (2016) study can therefore be used to support the use of music therapy to manage pain among infants undergoing painful procedures.
How do these two articles support the nurse practice issue you chose?
Lynch et al. (2020) study answers my picot question of ‘among patients coming out of surgery (P), what is the effect of music therapy (I) compared to conventional medicine (C) in managing postoperative pain (O) for a period of two days (T)?’ This is because it explores the perspective of patients when music therapy is used as a pain management intervention. On the other hand, Ullsten et al.’s (2016) study also answer the picot question because it seeks to explore the effectiveness of live music therapy as effective support for infants during painful procedures.
The intervention and comparison groups of the Lynch et al. (2020) study are similar to those of the picot question. In both the study and the picot question, the intervention group is music therapy, while the comparison group is conventional medicine. The intervention and comparison groups in the Ullsten et al. (2016) study are also similar to those of my picot question. In both the study and the picot question, the intervention group is music therapy, while the comparison group is conventional medicine.
Method of Study
Lynch et al. (2020) study adopts semi-structured interviews. This method is one of the most common qualitative research methods. The method entails the use of personal interviews that are carried out with one respondent at a time. The method also utilizes the conversational approach that invites the research participants to provide in-depth details and data to the researcher (Aspers & Corte, 2019). On the other hand, Ullsten et al. (2016) study adopted the case study approach. The case study approach is utilized to generate a multifaceted and in-depth understanding of a specific issue in its real-life context (Aspers & Corte, 2019). In the Ullsten et al. (2016) study, the researchers, therefore, performed a micro analysis of infants who are undergoing painful procedures while they were exposed to music therapy.
The main benefit of the semi-structured interviews method adopted by Lynch et al. (2020) is that the method offers a great opportunity for the researchers to gather precise qualitative data from the research participants. On the other hand, the main limitation of a semi-structured interview method is that it is a time-consuming method with the researcher needing to spend several hours interviewing each research participant (Aspers & Corte, 2019). The main benefit of the case study approach adopted by Ullsten et al. (2016) is that the method is convenient and inexpensive. To conduct a case study analysis, researchers only have to avail themselves and study the chosen phenomena. However, one of the main limitations of the case study method is that it’s a labor-intensive method of data collection which requires the researchers to have high-level data collection and language skills and put a lot of effort into data collection and analysis (Aspers & Corte, 2019).
Results of Study
The key findings of Lynch et al. (2020) study are that patients will experience passive and active music therapy in different ways, with both approaches having unique benefits to coping with pain as a result of cancer. On the other hand, the key findings of the Ullsten et al. (2016) study are that live music therapy was an effective communicative interaction that optimized homeostatic mechanisms among infants during painful procedures. This indicates that live music therapy provides regular comfort against pain among infants undergoing painful procedures.
The implications of the Lynch et al. (2020) study to nursing practice are that nurses in different healthcare settings should adopt the use of both passive and active music therapy as a supplementary approach to pain management. On the other hand, the implications of the Ullsten et al. (2016) study to nursing practice are that nurses in the neonatal unit should utilize live music therapy in combination with analgesics to manage pain among infants.
