(Answered) Research Critique Guidelines

(Answered) Research Critique Guidelines

(Answered) Research Critique Guidelines 150 150 Prisc

Research Critique Guidelines

Use the practice problem and two quantitative, peer-reviewed research articles you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.
In a 1,000 – 1,250 word essay, summarize two quantitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Picot Question: Patients 65 years and older with cardiovascular disease what are their perception on self-care post discharge education?
Article 1 : Chromiec, P. A., Urbaś, Z. K., Jacko, M., & Kaczor, J. J. (2021). The Proper Diet and Regular Physical Activity Slow Down the Development of Parkinson Disease. Aging & Disease, 12(7), 1605–1623. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.14336/AD.2021.0123

Article #2 : Chaising, S., Prasad, R., & Temdee, P. (2021). Personalized Recommendation Method for Preventing Elderly People from Cardiovascular Disease Complication Using Integrated Objective Distance. Wireless Personal Communications, 117(1), 215–233.

Sample Answer

Quantitative Studies

Background

Chaising et al., (2019) study focus on the problem of providing a personalized recommendation that can be utilized to prevent the onset of complications as a result of cardiovascular diseases among elderly people. In the study, Chaising et al. (2019) highlights that the integrated objective distance is one of the most effective methods that can help to prevent complications among elderly people with cardiovascular disease. The main purpose and objective of the study is to determine a personalized recommendation that can be adopted among elderly people to prevent them from any complications arising from cardiovascular diseases. The research question explored in Chaising et al., (2019) study is among elderly people with cardiovascular diseases, how effective will be the personalized recommendation of integrated objective distance in preventing the onset of complications related to cardiovascular diseases? Chaising et al., (2019) study is significant to nursing because it helps to test an intervention that can be adopted by nurse practitioners to help prevent the onset of complications among elderly people with cardiovascular diseases. By testing the efficacy of integrated objective distance, the study can therefore provide an evidence-based practice that can be adopted in healthcare settings.

On the other hand, Roshandel et al., (2021) quantitative study’s main purpose is to determine whether the use of multimedia-based peer education will contribute to an increase in self-care adherence and quality of life among elderly patients suffering from coronary artery disease. The purpose and objective of Roshandel et al. (2021) was to evaluate whether a multimedia-based peer education approach contributed significantly to an increase in the mean scores of adherence, self-care, and quality of life among elderly patients with coronary artery disease. The main research question explored by Roshandel et al. (2021) is that among elderly individuals suffering from coronary heart disease, what will be the effect of adopting a multimedia-based peer education approach on the mean scores of adherence, self-care, and quality of life Roshandel et al., (2021) study is significant to nursing because it evaluates the effectiveness of a  specific intervention that can be utilized to help improve the outcomes of elderly patients with coronary heart disease such as adherence, self-care, and quality of life. The study contributes to nursing practice by proposing and testing an intervention that can be adopted in nursing practice.

How do these two articles support the nurse practice issue you chose?

Chaising et al., (2019) quantitative study will be used to answer the picot question of among patients 65 years and older with cardiovascular disease what are their perceptions on self-care post-discharge education? Because the study focuses on personalized recommendation approaches that can be adopted to prevent complications arising from cardiovascular diseases among elderly people. The problem issue and the target population in Chaising et al., (2019) quantitative study and the picot question are therefore similar. On the other hand, Roshandel et al.’s, 2021) quantitative study relates to the picot question in that the study explores different approaches that can help to improve their adherence, self-care, and quality of life among elderly patients with coronary artery disease, including multimedia peer education. The problem of interest and the population of focus in Roshandel et al., (2021) quantitative study and the picot question are therefore similar.

The intervention and comparison groups in Chaising et al., (2019) study is using integrated objective distance and not using integrated objective distance consecutively. On the other hand, the intervention and comparison groups in the picot question are self-care post-discharge education and not receiving self-care post-discharge education. The intervention and comparison groups in Chaising et al., (2019) study and the Pico question are therefore different. On the other hand, the intervention and comparison groups in Roshandel et al., (2021) study are the use of multimedia-based peer education approach compared to not using a multimedia-based education approach. The intervention and comparison groups in Roshandel et al., (2021) study are different from those of the picot question, which include self-care post-discharge education and not receiving self-care post-discharge education.