Importance of Peer Review
1). Describe the importance of peer-review and how to determine if information is peer reviewed
2). Choose 2 other criteria for determining quality info & develop a discussion similar to the peer-review requirement
3). Be detailed on how the info/s assessed and why these criteria is chosen
People and society can be profoundly affected by scientific discoveries and insights. ‘Peer review is the procedure by which they are checked for quality before they are published. Prior to the scholarly journal, the notion of peer review was already in place and widely used. Peer review has been used as a way of appraising written work since ancient Greece, according to specific sources. In his book Ethics of the Physician, Syrian physician Ishaq bin Ali al-Rahwi first defined the peer-review procedure (Rezaeian, 2018). In that passage, he noted that doctors must keep records of their patient’s medical problems at each appointment. A medical council in the area reviewed the doctor’s records after the treatment to see if the doctor satisfied the required standards of medical care. It was possible that a patient who was harmed as a result of a doctor’s incompetence may file a lawsuit against the doctor in the issue. Authors submit their research and academic work to other experts in the same area for peer review to ensure its validity and determine if it is appropriate for publication. In order to properly assess material, peer review is an essential component (Palmatier et al., 2018). To guarantee that the papers they publish are of the highest quality, journals employ the peer review process, and publications published in peer-reviewed journals are frequently validated with experimental research. It is customary for editors of peer-reviewed journals to distribute an article to other academics in the same area to solicit feedback on its educational value its applicability to the field, among others (Pastrana et al., 2020). This paper discusses how to know if an article is peer-reviewed and the importance of peer review.
Importance of Peer Review
An author’s academic work, research, or ideas are subjected to the examination of other professionals in the same area through peer review. To guarantee that no unsupported claims, undesirable interpretations, or personal opinions are published without previous expert assessment, peer review is essential in encouraging scholars to meet the established high standards of their field and to govern the distribution of research data (Koshy et al., 2018). Peer review has become an integral part of academic writing in the scientific community. As a result, peer review helps researchers to publish papers with confidence, knowing that the findings presented therein are grounded in well-conducted experiments. Low-quality articles are being submitted more often, and peer review works as a filter to keep them from being published in scientific journals (Koshy et al., 2018). As a result, peer-reviewed papers can be relied upon as reliable sources of scientific information. This trust is critical because scientific research is progressive and grows on itself. Peer review has become the bedrock of the scholarly publication system because it successfully exposes an author’s work to the examination of other experts in the discipline. As a result, it motivates writers to generate high-quality research that advances the subject of study they are working in.
Peer review also helps to maintain scientific integrity and honesty. Unless it is published in a peer-reviewed publication, academics rarely accept a scientific idea or assertion. While it is important to establish whether or not an article is appropriate for publication in a given journal’s scope, it is equally important to ensure that the study subject is well-described and that an appropriate method of addressing the scientific challenges is used. Methodology reviews assist researchers to establish whether their findings can be replicated and, moreover, they help determine whether the study findings are new and unique (Pastrana et al., 2020). Peer review is essential whether the work includes people or animals since it covers ethical issues. Aside from this, it is vital to analyze how rationally the argument has been developed and whether the conclusions are supported by evidence. It’s also common for authors to receive helpful feedback on how to enhance their work. An article’s validity, quality, and frequent originality are assessed by peer reviewers. Its ultimate goal is to protect scientific integrity by removing papers that are either invalid or of low quality. Peer review serves as a sort of content filter for publishers, guiding high-quality papers to high-quality journals and thereby establishing journal brand recognition.
At the very foundations of our knowledge creation systems, peer review is seen as a way to ensure that research is of high quality or validity while at the same time awarding academic reputation and position to people. To avoid becoming bogged down in a particular phase of development, it is important to examine your work. It is possible to forget about the cycles of learning and development when you review your progress. Peer review assists in clarifying, achieving, measuring, and celebrating objectives (Pastrana et al., 2020). Peer review also helps people learn from their own experiences, as well as those of others. It is also important in developing self-confidence. Individuals who have more self-confidence, as well as improved learning capacity, can be more autonomous and capable of self-improvement. In the event of an emergency, a peer review can be a lifesaver. People are more willing to take chances when they know they will be supported if they fail. It is possible to determine what led to a person’s success or failure so that they can improve their chances of success in the future. Examining activities demonstrates that the reviewer cares about the experiences of others, values their input, and is engaged in the growth and development of each individual. People learn better when they are treated with compassion, worth, and respect.
How to Determine if Information is Peer-Reviewed
The process of determining whether the information in an article is peer-reviewed or not is not an easy one. One of the best methods to tell if the information is peer-reviewed or not is through the use of the journal information page found in the journal website or on the database. The journal information page contains the publication information of the article or the scholarly work, such as the publisher, editors of the information, and the place of publication. In most cases, it consists of a box located either at the end of the work or towards the front of the work. If the information in the publication is peer-reviewed, the masthead of the publication says it is peer-reviewed. If not, the next step to tell whether is the information is peer-reviewed is identifying the methods that were used to submit the information in the publication. Submitting information such as “to submit articles, send three copies…” in the journal information or in the masthead of publication tells that the information is most probably peer-reviewed. In this case, this information denotes that the work is going to send numerous copies of the information to the journal viewers (Palmatier et al., 2018). However, it is not always to rely on this method alone since some databases or journal websites sometimes do not provide the information. Therefore, it is recommended to use this method in conjunction with other criteria.
Another criterion that can be used to tell whether the information is peer-reviewed is through the author of the information. Studies that have been subjected to peer review are almost always authored by professors, researchers, or other academics who are experts in their field and can usually be identified by the university where they work. One’s research project’s quality will be significantly influenced by the quality of the author they choose to use. In order to assess if the information author is reliable, an individual should review the author’s preface or foreword. Here, the author’s expertise is generally laid forth in detail (Palmatier et al., 2018). Often, but not always, the material supplied anonymously is less peer-reviewed than articles or research whose authors are known. People who put their name to anything they have written are likely confident in the facts contained within. It’s usually a good idea to examine the author’s credentials if one knows their name. In addition, one can search the online Library Catalog to find what further papers the author has written on the subject or similar themes or to learn more about the author’s expertise. Peer-reviewed articles often mention the qualifications and affiliations of the author(s) (Palmatier et al., 2018). Peer-reviewed articles are also written by experts in their respective disciplines. Authors that are reputable and trustworthy and their work is peer-reviewed will also include citations to their sources so that others may verify their work.
Other Criteria for Determining Quality Information
In addition to the two above-described criteria to determine the quality of information, other several criteria can also be used. They include;
The title, abstract, introduction, methods, findings, discussion, conclusions, and references are all standard parts of scientific publications submitted for peer review. It is imperative that the title of a study include the subject matter and the organisms studied, as well as the variables that were controlled and the systems that were employed in the study. An abstract is a quick description of a research paper’s background, methodologies, principal findings, and conclusions (Meo, 2018). The purpose of the introduction of a scientific publication is to explain why the issue under investigation is important to the scientific community and what knowledge gap the study seeks to address. The research question is presented in this context in the introduction. An explanation of the experiment’s purpose is provided in the methods section (Meo, 2018). The equipment and reagents used in the inquiry are also included in this section. Without any judgment, prejudice, or interpretation, the experiment’s findings and patterns are laid forth in the results section. The data is evaluated in the discussion section (Meo, 2018). Referencing lists all sources mentioned in the text that provides context, techniques, and/or interpretations for the material presented in the study. This criterion is important since it determines how well the author has presented their argument. A piece of well-structured information helps the reviewers and also the reader to follow the paper’s idea or logic and also to understand it. A lack of attention to the structure of a paper is a clear sign of a less credible researcher who is unable to analyze the formal procedures that are critical for a high-index publication to be normalized. As a result of this, it is important to examine the paper’s structure and quality to ensure that it reflects high-quality research (Meo, 2018). To do the reverse would be to offer grounds to reject a piece of work that, despite its uniqueness in its research, does not reflect it in its presentation.
Most material prepared for a public audience does not include a list of references or bibliography however information that has been peer-reviewed will. Doubts about an individual’s academic abilities, academic honesty, or even the possibility of plagiarism can arise from a lack of proper citations (Santini, 2018). Peer-reviewed information can only be established by meticulously citing the sources. Lack of proper citations is taken as an indication of intellectual laziness, confused reasoning, and inaccuracy by an editor or other reader. Peer-reviewing is not possible for content that does not have reputable sources mentioned and referenced (Santini, 2018). An author’s perspective is clear to the reader if they acknowledge their sources appropriately. An impressive list of references demonstrates the author’s command of the scientific literature. Scientists with broad bibliographies are well-read and well-informed. Researchers can be accused of lacking thoroughness or expertise in their field if they fail to provide a citation to a key or well-known publication in their work (Santini, 2018). If a reviewer sees this, they can conclude that the work is plagiarized. As a result, most peer-reviewed information has well documented and cited sources of information.
When choosing high-quality, new, and intriguing research articles for publication in scientific journals, peer review has become an essential part of the selection process. Assessing the credibility and quality of any research work is crucial in ensuring that information is accurate and reliable. One credible source of information is peer-reviewed publications. Several criteria can be used to identify peer-reviewed publications. However, it is essential not to rely on one criterion.
Koshy, K., Fowler, A. J., Gundogan, B., & Agha, R. A. (2018). Peer review in scholarly publishing part A: why do it?. IJS Oncology, 3(2), e56. https://journals.lww.com/ijsoncology/Fulltext/2018/02000/Peer_review_in_scholarly_publishing_part_A___why.1.aspx
Meo, S. A. (2018). Anatomy and physiology of a scientific paper. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 25(7), 1278-1283. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319562X18300135
Palmatier, R. W., Houston, M. B., & Hulland, J. (2018). Review articles: Purpose, process, and structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 1-5. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4
Pastrana, I. R. M., Hernández, A. V., Manjarrez, F. E. P., López, E. O., Romero-Henríquez, L. F., & López-Ortiz, G. (2020). Peer-review and rejection causes in submitting original medical manuscripts. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 40(3), 182-186. https://journals.lww.com/jcehp/Abstract/2020/04030/Peer_Review_and_Rejection_Causes_in_Submitting.6.aspx
Rezaeian, M. (2018). The history of the editorial peer review in publication of scientific articles. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, 16(12), 1095-1096. http://journal.rums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_id=4216&slc_lang=en&sid=en&ftxt=1&html=1
Santini, A. (2018). The importance of referencing. The Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 4(1), 3-4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5953266/